Marlon Marmolejo
Materials Development for Foreign Language Classrooms
Professor: Marinella Garatti
Why can’t students remember more? It seems to be the question without answer for millions of teachers around the world. “Memory and recall are critical elements in the learning process for very practical reasons. The only way we know that students have learned something is if they can demonstrate recall of it” (Jensen, 1998). But how can we expect this to happen when they seem to be unable to have access to the knowledge stored in their brains? Maybe it is time to stop sending students to their uncharted world of information without maps to guide their way to that knowledge. I think that the best way to know what we are looking for, it is to know where to find it. And perhaps, with the help of technology, students can learn how to design their own memory devices for easier, faster and better recall. This paper aims to show how Mind Maps, created with or without technology, can help retain information and most importantly, how to find it more efficiently when needed, making recall an easier task.
“A Mind Map or Mind Mapping is a pictorial representation how a central concept is linked to other concepts and issues.” (Farrand et al., 2002). This is possible through the use of “schemata”, that explains the ability to acquire more information due to previous knowledge that is already possessed. For most researchers, “Mental Maps, Mind Maps, Cognitive Maps, Cognitive Models or Mental Models are a type of mental processing, composed of a series of psychological transformations by which an individual can acquire, code, store, recall and decode information about the relative locations and attributes of phenomena in their everyday or metaphorical spatial environment.” This explains why learning must be conceived as a “personal experience”, though the subject matter to be learned is the same to a group of individuals. For example, in a class where teaching the different parts of the house and furniture are the main goal, students will store and recall the information depending on the way they prioritized them when exposed to it. Some will not have any problem recreating vocabulary related to the rooms of the house and maybe reproduce the one related to furniture with much more difficulty because they might even have at home half of the items mentioned in class. It is at this moment when the concept of Mind Map plays an important role in learning. “Mind Maps are similar to a semantic network or cognitive map but there are no normal restrictions on the kinds of links used.” (Farrand et al., 2002). The beauty of the use of Mind Maps lies in the fact that it makes learning a unique and personalized experience. By the use of colors, words, lines, images, students get to deconstruct and reconstruct information in their own terms. They organize their ideas (information) according to the importance of the concepts by dividing then into groups, branches, areas, subareas or whatever they might consider relevant. This explains why some people can remember where things are, even though they might not seem to be in the appropriate place for others; these people have their own “tidy mess”. Students cannot be told where to store the information, which our traditional way of teaching and evaluating is forcing them to do.
When students create their own Mind Maps, they elaborate “a multicolored and image centered radial diagram that represents semantic or other connections between portions of learned material” (Farrand et al., 2002), whose unique and personal way of gathering information for the construction of the semantic structure help the reconsolidation of memories. For example, if we were to read a short a list of 10 words to a group of students and insisted on its being reproduced in the same linear way that it was taught, we would be heading for disaster. But if we allowed students to organized it and reproduce it in any way they want, we will get better results. Why? Because, students will categorize, divide or group the pieces of information based on their preferences and experience; that is by creating their own Mind Maps. As “there is no single location for all our memories” (Jensen 1998), certainly, there cannot be a single way to store memories (information).
“People have been using Mind Maps for centuries, for learning, brainstorming, memory, visual thinking and problem solving in areas such as engineering, education and psychology, although the origin of the Mind map has been made by a British popular psychology author, Tony Buzan” (Farrand et al., 2002). Tony Buzan “claimed the idea was inspired by the general semantics of science fiction novels, such as those of A. E. Van Vogt and L. Ron Hubbard.” He also “argues that “traditional” articles rely on the reader to scan left to right and top to bottom, whilst what actually happens is that the brain will scan the entire page in a non-linear fashion.” This brings to my attention the way Mind Maps work, where the learners might focus their attention on a specific piece of information regardless of its position on the text, which might explain why some recall certain information more easily that is not relevant to others. And if this is true, I wonder if our students could benefit more if we could tailor our lessons and activities in a non-linear fashion. I will end this paper by presenting and trying to explain a year round project that might help adapt our traditional linear designed textbooks and way of teaching to Mr. Buzan’s non-linear concept.
Patricia Woffe (2001) states “that whatever event that comes to mind, we remember it, not in words, but in images and sounds.” And she also says “that when we describe the event to someone else, we use words of course, but what we are describing is what we are seeing and hearing inside our heads.” I think this a great way to illustrate a Mind Map, but it is merely an experience outside the academic or scholar world. How one can bring this easy way of recollection of experiences into the classroom? We should start by analyzing the main tool students utilize to store information (input) and this is “note taking”. The traditional linear form of taking notes can become a straight jacket for the students’ brains. On the other hand, “Software and technique research have concluded that managers and students find the techniques of Mind Mapping to be useful, being better able to retain information and ideas than by using traditional 'linear' note taking methods.” (Farrand et al., 2002).
Buzan (1991) “claims that the Mind Map is a vastly superior note taking method because it does not lead to the alleged "semi-hypnotic trance" state induced by the other note forms. Buzan also claims that the mind map utilizes the full range of left and right human cortical skills, balances the brain, taps into the 99% of your unused mental potential, and taps into your intuition (which he calls "superlogic"). It also seems that the use of Mind Maps in note taking can tap into the Multiple Intelligence Theory (Gardner, 1999) since students can utlize their stronger skills when creating their Mind Maps. For example, by designing charts or visual outlines (visual-spatial intelligence), by asigning numerical values to the different elements (mathematical intelligence) or by associating the element to favorite tunes or songs (musical intelligence).
Mind Maps provide students with the freedom to create symbols and images to illustrate their idas as well as beautify their classwork. This makes Mind Mapping very appealing to most students “since the details are organized in categories, and a visual pattern unifies the separate parts as a whole.” (Campbell et al., 2004). When using Mind Mapping the possibilities are endless, which reinforces the sense of individuality of every student in the classroom.
“Mind Maps can be drawn by hand, either as 'rough notes', for example, during a lecture or meeting, or can be more sophisticated in quality. Examples of both are illustrated. There are also a number of software packages available for producing Mind Maps.” (Farrand et al., 2002). These are the foundation structures of a Mind Map, although these are open to free interpretation by the individual:
Mind Mapping guidelines
1. Start in the centre with an image of the topic, using at least 3 colours.
2. Use images, symbols, codes and dimensions throughout your Mind Map.
3. Select key words and print using upper or lower case letters.
4. Each word/image must be alone and sitting on its own line.
5. The lines must be connected, starting from the central image. The central lines are thicker, organic and flowing, becoming thinner as they radiate out from the centre.
6. Make the lines the same length as the word/image.
7. Use colours – your own code – throughout the Mind Map.
8. Develop your own personal style of Mind Mapping.
9. Use emphasis and show associations in your Mind Map.
10. Keep the Mind Map clear by using Radiant hierarchy, numerical order or outlines to embrace your branches.
( BUZAN, Tony. The Mind Map Book. Chapter "Mind Mapping Guidelines).
I find Mr. Buzan’s Mind Mapping guidelines very assertive and useful but at the same time a little constricting due to its physical nature. I think the Mind Mapping goes beyond physical representations into more abstract ones. Put more simply, Mind Maps become “cognitive maps that are a way we use to structure and store spatial knowledge, allowing the "mind's eye" to visualize images in order to reduce cognitive load, and enhance recall and learning of information. This type of spatial thinking can also be used as a metaphor for non-spatial tasks, where people, performing non-spatial tasks involving memory and imaging, use spatial knowledge to aid in processing the task.” (Kitchin, 1994). This makes reference to an old method to recall information which is the “method of loci”. To use this method one must first memorize the appearance of a physical location (for example, the sequence of rooms in a building). When a list of words, for example, needs to be memorized, the learner visualizes an object representing that word in one of the pre-memorized locations. To recall the list, the learner mentally "walks through" the memorized locations, noticing the objects placed there during the memorization phase” (Belleza, 1999). It is said that “this method was originally used by students of rhetoric in ancient Rome when memorizing speeches.”
Based on the information gathered from the concept of Mind Mapping and the “method loci”, I think the following school project can help students achieve better long term results in the language class through the Mind Map strategies. The project will not only let the students use the strategies from Mind Mapping, but will also make our traditional textbooks more computer friendly. Thus providing more options and training with the new technology.
This simple activity will encourage students to use web-based information and exercises to make their textbooks evolve with the class and new topics throughout the year. And at the same time develop their Mind mapping skill. The project consists of 6 steps.
Step 1. Character assignment
Students will be asked to create a character native to the country whose language they are being taught. This character will be given a name and basic personal information that will be kept in a dossier.
Step 2. Dossier assignment
Students will be asked to keep a dossier with the character’s personal information. This dossier will be revised at the end of every quarter. Students will be also requested to present their character orally to the teacher and the class.
Step 3. Character development.
As the year progresses, the character’s persona will begin to evolve with every single topic and lesson covered in class. For example, after studying family members and relatives’ relationships, the character will be assigned one with names and how he or she is related to the others.
Step 4. Virtual information.
Students will be asked to do web-research inherent to the character’s country of origin to provide real biographical information to their character. Some assignments will be posted on line as a way to prepare students for the undergraduate and graduate demands of college. A website must be created by the teacher since students will be cutting, pasting and printing their assignments from it. This will provide a safe link for students and a way to be monitored by the teacher every time they sign in.
Step 5. Making virtual friends.
Students will be asked to create an electronic address for his character in order to communicate via e-mail with some other student’s character as if they were e-pals (Pen Pals). This will foster written communication among students without any anxiety. Some homework assignments will consist in presenting a copy of some of those e-mails. It is very important to monitor constantly to make sure students are making progress with their assignments.
Step 6. Final presentation.
At the end of the school year students will have a final presentation where they will display and explain their character biographically.
I firmly believe that this activity will exploit a regular textbook by providing it with a technological dimension that students will not only enjoy, but will learn from. This will also give teachers the chance to pilot their own material and the chance to modify textbooks to suit the students and teachers’ needs. If you decide to run this activity through the principles of materials development stated by Tomlinson (1998) you will find the results quite reassuring.
I think that the benefits of using Mind Maps, both mental and physical ones (concept maps, spider maps, charts, etc.) are limitless, especially with the help of technology. Mind Maps represent a great stimulus for the “active processing” (Memory Storage Processes) that turns short-term into long-term memory. Unfortunately, they also have their shortcomings. “Research by Farrand, Hussain, and Hennessy (2002) found that the Mind Map technique had a limited but significant impact on recall only” which means we still need to deal with the information storage problem. Students might also find that Mind Mapping represents dealing with a new, unfamiliar technique to embrace it immediately as “memory enhancing” and therefore relying back on the all techniques. Pressley, VanEtten, Yokoi, Freebern, and VanMeter (1998) “found that learners tended to learn far better by focusing on the content of learning material than rather worrying over any particular form of note-making.” The question that still remains after these findings for many would be: why bother? I have to say in defense of Mind Mapping that this strategy is in its way to be perfected and, as any other strategy, it cannot offer all the perfect solutions to the problems of learning. However, in consort with the many others that we use in teaching and learning, it becomes a strong ally in the conquest of knowledge.
Bibliography
Buzan, T. (1991) The Mind Map Book.
New York: Penguin
Belleza, F. S. (1999) The Spatial Arrangement Mnemonic, Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied, 5(1): 54-75.
Campbell, L. Campbell, B. Dickenson, D. (2004) Teaching and Learning through Multiple
Intelligences. “Everyone is an artist, visual-spatial intelligence”.
Pearson Ed.
Cognitive map.
Retrieved Dec. 3rd, 2005
Farrand, P. Hussain, F. et al. (2002) The efficacy of the “Mind map” study technique.
May; 36(5):426-31. EBSCOHost. Retrieve Dec. 3rd, 2005
Harper, Jane et al. (1997) The Coming of Age of the Profession “Issues and Emerging
Ideas For the teaching of Foreign Languages”.
Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
“Technology a Step Forward in the Teaching of Foreign Languages”
Jorge H. Cubillos, University of Delaware. P. 37-52.
Jensen, Erick (1998) Teaching with the Brain in Mind: “Memory and Recall”
Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD Publishers. 11, 99-112.
Kitchin, R. M. (1994) Cognitive Maps: What Are They and Why Study Them?
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14: 1-19.
Mind Map.
Retrieved Dec. 3rd, 2005.
Salend, Spencer J. (2005) Creating Inclusive Classrooms “Effective and Reflective
Practices for All Students” Fifth Edition
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Publishers.
Tomlinson, Brian (1998) Materials Development in Language Teaching.
Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfe, Patricia (2001) Brain Matters: “Using visual and Auditory Senses”
Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD Publishers. 9, 151-169.